
Data Hemorrhages: Digital Medical Records Run Wild
Electronic medical records are in the news, with President Obama calling for the medical records of
every American to be digitized by 2014, and the stimulus
package providing $19 billion to make it happen.
The plan's many critics are concerned about data security,
but recent research by Tuck professor M. Eric
Johnson shows that patient data is already hemorrhaging
from the health-care system. His antidote,
however, may surprise you: "Moving hospitals and
health-care organizations towards larger, enterprisebased
software systems—which is exactly what the
Obama administration is pushing for—will in fact
improve this problem," says
Johnson.
Johnson's new research
shows that the danger
comes less from digital medical
records than from the
ad hoc programs on which
many of them are stored, including
Excel files and Microsoft
Word documents.
From those highly insecure
formats medical data can go
almost anywhere. "When
these data get into things like spreadsheets, the inadvertent
disclosure comes from all over the place—lost
laptops, portable zip-drives, and even email," Johnson
says.
Johnson and his colleagues examined data hemorrhages
from one such source: Internet-based file-sharing
networks. Users who connect to these so-called
peer-to-peer (P2P) networks, many of whom do so
at work, permit others to search for and copy files
stored on their computers. While the overwhelming
majority of P2P users are hunting for, say, the latest
Jonas Brothers hit, fraudsters can as easily search for
medical identities to exploit.
Johnson and his colleagues searched the four most
popular P2P networks for keywords associated with
Fortune magazine's 10 largest publicly traded healthcare
companies, which together account for nearly $70
billion in health-care spending. An initial sample collected
over two weeks yielded 3,328 files, 389 of which
were relevant to health-care or the target firms. About
five percent of those contained sensitive information.
Johnson then focused on those P2P users whose computers
contained the most sensitive files. That search
uncovered sensitive information on tens of thousands
of individuals, including medical and psychiatric
diagnoses. One such document, a government employment application stuffed full of personal
details, ironically included a three-page Privacy
Act warning. Another contained the names, Social
Security numbers, and health insurance providers of
more than 20,000 people. Highly personal information
of this type is fodder for any number of nefarious
purposes, from conventional financial identity theft
and medical billing schemes to the fraudulent acquisition
of medical services and prescription drugs.
As financial institutions have become more secure,
and also much better at detecting fraud, health-care
is now emerging as the next big target for data theft,
Johnson says. The fragmented network of providers
and supporting companies makes the health-care sector
especially vulnerable to identity theft and related
fraud. These crimes can do tremendous damage to an
individual's reputation and health, and the monetary
costs are staggering.
"With the electronic availability of this kind of data,
it's much easier to perpetrate a large crime and to do
it more quickly," Johnson says. Take, for example,
the clinic desk supervisor whose role in a $7.1-million
fraud was to telephone an accomplice with personal
information about the people she admitted, one
patient at a time. "That's just kind of a slow drip,"
Johnson says. "But if she can get 20,000 patients on a
spreadsheet and email that to somebody, wow."
This article appears in the May 2009 issue of Tuck Forum.
|